- Elmore Leonard
From the book "Snoopy's Guide to the Writing Life".

In unrelated blogging news...
We are going to Universal Studios today!
Yes, got a day off. YEAH!
I'll bring my camera.
Random thoughts, stories, frustrations, rants, raves, blahs... all from the POV of a Hungry Hungry Screenwriter...
If you don't have the time to read, you don't have the time or the tools to write. Stephen King (1947 - ), On Writing, p. 147
"Dreams are illustrations... from the book your soul is writing about you." ~Marsha NormanI was so out of it this morning. I got out of the shower, made coffee and got dressed for work.
"Man is a genius when he is dreaming." Akira Kurosawa. Japanese filmmaker.I guess I was a genius last night.
"One night a father overheard his son pray: Dear God, Make me the kind of man my Daddy is. Later that night, the Father prayed, Dear God, Make me the kind of man my son wants me to be." -Anonymous
"Why is Dwight such a good drawer? He's the best.
He's better than no-one." Jake
The estimate to recover data from the 30GB hard drive you described is:So I'm taking donations right now! Paypal is best. ;)A special 10% discount will be applied to your final recovery cost. This discount does not apply to the attempt fee or to any backup media you may purchase.
- Standard 1-2 Business Day Service: $900-3900.
- Economy 5-7 Business Day Service: $500-2700.
- There is a $200.00 attempt fee if the data is not recoverable.
- Priority Round-the-Clock/Weekend Service: $1800-8900, with a $800.00 attempt fee.
Recovered data can be put on the media of your choice such as a replacement drive, CD, DVD, DAT tape, magneto-optical or removable media cartridges and floppies.
Study of children's reading habits shows encouraging resultsThis research came from http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/, a literacy organization in the UK.
According to a Tesco study that asked 2,600 parents about their children's reading habits, the perception that children spend their lives glued to a computer screen is either a myth or a huge exaggeration. About 40% of parents think their children read more than they did at the same age, which has given rise to the phenomenon of "crossovers" - books that children recommend to parents. The most famous example of a crossover is Harry Potter; others listed in Tesco's top 10 include Holes by Louis Sachar.
Caroline Ridding, the book buyer for Tesco, said, "Contrary to popular belief, children read more today than ever before. Far from being obsessed with TV and computer games, our study show their love of reading is greater than ever."
The most popular children-to-parent children titles were:
1. Harry Potter (books 1-5), JK Rowling
2. Adrian Mole series, Sue Townsend
3. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time, Mark Haddon
4. His Dark Materials (1-4), Philip Pullman
5. Holes, Louis Sachar
6. A Series of Unfortunate Events (1-11), Lemony Snicket
7. Sophie's World, Jostein Haarder
8. How I Live Now, Meg Rosoff
9. Junk, Melvin Burgess
10. The Scarecrow and his Servant, Philip Pullman
The most recommended parent-to-child titles were:
1. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis
2. The Hobbit, JRR Tolkein
3. The Borrowers, Mary Norton
4. The Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkein
5. Alice in Wonderland, Lewis Carroll
6. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Roald Dahl
7. Famous Five series, Enid Blyton
8. Black Beauty, Anna Sewell
9. Mallory Towers series, Enid Blyton
10. Heidi, Joanna Spryi
Do parents matter?Although I believe this research is not at all a very complete one as they also state: "the data show no correlation between a child's test scores and how often his parents read to him", I thought it was an interesting coorelation between books and education.
It's who you are — rather than what you do — that makes the biggest difference in the development of children.
By Stephen J. Dubner and Steven D. Levitt
By now, the letters have landed.
The fast-track nursery schools and the “gifted and talented” public schools and the Ivy League colleges have mailed their acceptance letters, and parents everywhere are either a) congratulating themselves for having shepherded their children into the dream school or b) chiding themselves for having failed.
In the first case, the parents may tell themselves: It was those Mozart quartets we played in utero that primed her for success. In the second case, they might say: I knew we shouldn't have waited so long to get him his first computer. But how much credit, or blame, should parents really claim for their children's accomplishments? The answer, it turns out, is a lot — but not for the reasons that most parents think.
The U.S. Department of Education recently undertook a monumental project called the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, which tracks the progress of more than 20,000 American schoolchildren from kindergarten through the fifth grade. Aside from gathering each child's test scores and the standard demographic information, the ECLS also asks the children's parents a wide range of questions about the families' habits and activities. The result is an extraordinarily rich set of data that, when given a rigorous economic analysis, tells some compelling stories about parenting technique.
A child with at least 50 kids' books in his home, for instance, scores roughly 5 percentile points higher than a child with no books, and a child with 100 books scores another 5 percentile points higher than a child with 50 books. Most people would look at this correlation and draw the obvious cause-and-effect conclusion: A little boy named, say, Brandon has a lot of books in his home; Brandon does beautifully on his reading test; this must be because Brandon's parents read to him regularly.
But the ECLS data show no correlation between a child's test scores and how often his parents read to him. How can this be? Here is a sampling of other parental factors that matter and don't:Matters: The child has highly educated parents. Doesn't: The child regularly watches TV at home. Matters: The child's parents have high income. Doesn't: The child's mother didn't work between birth and kindergarten. Matters: The child's parents speak English in the home. Doesn't: The child's parents regularly take him to museums. Matters: The child's mother was 30 or older at time of the child's birth. Doesn't: The child attended Head Start. Matters: The child's parents are involved in the PTA. Doesn't: The child is regularly spanked at home.
Culture cramming may be a foundational belief of modern parenting but, according to the data, it doesn't improve early childhood test scores. Frequent museum visits would seem to be no more productive than trips to the grocery store. Watching TV, meanwhile, doesn't turn a child's brain into mush after all; nor does the presence of a home computer turn a child into Einstein.
Now, back to the original riddle: How can it be that a child with a lot of books in her home does well at school even if she never reads them? Because parents who buy a lot of children's books tend to be smart and well-educated to begin with — and they pass on their smarts and work ethic to their kids. (This theory is supported by the fact that the number of books in a home is just as strongly correlated with math scores as reading scores.) Or the books may suggest that these are parents who care a great deal about education and about their children in general, which results in an environment that rewards learning. Such parents may believe that a book is a talisman that leads to unfettered intelligence. But they are probably wrong. A book is, in fact, less a cause of intelligence than an indicator.
The most interesting conclusion here is one that many modern parents may find disturbing: Parenting technique is highly overrated. When it comes to early test scores, it's not so much what you do as a parent, it's who you are.
It is obvious that children of successful, well-educated parents have a built-in advantage over the children of struggling, poorly educated parents. Call it a privilege gap. The child of a young, single mother with limited education and income will typically test about 25 percentile points lower than the child of two married, high-earning parents.
So it isn't that parents don't matter. Clearly, they matter an awful lot. It's just that by the time most parents pick up a book on parenting technique, it's too late. Many of the things that matter most were decided long ago — what kind of education a parent got, how hard he worked to build a career, what kind of spouse he wound up with and how long they waited to have children.
The privilege gap is far more real than the fear that haunts so many modern parents — that their children will fail miserably without regular helpings of culture cramming and competitive parenting. So, yes, parents are entitled to congratulate themselves this month over their children's acceptance letters. But they should also stop kidding themselves: The Mozart tapes had nothing to do with it.
Stephen J. Dubner and Steven D. Levitt are the authors of Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything.
See article: "Do Parents Matter?
Why should we write?
We should write because it is human nature to write. Writing claims our world. It makes it directly and specifically our own. We should write because humans are spiritual beings and writing is a powerful form of prayer and meditation, connecting us both to our own insights and to a higher and deeper level of inner guidance.
We should write because writing brings clarity and passion to the act of living. Writing is sensual, experiential, grounding. We should write because writing is good for the soul. We should write because writing yields us a body of work, a felt path through the world we live in.
We should write, above all, because we are writers, whether we call ourselves that or not.-from The Right to Write (Julia Cameron)
Eye Exam
A guy goes to his eye doctor for an examination. They start talking as the doctor is examing his eyes. In the middle of their conversation, the doctor casually says, "You need to stop masturbating."
The guy replies, "Why Doc? Am I going blind?"
The doctor says, "No, but you're upsetting the other patients in the waiting room."
If you masturbate you will go blind or bald or get acne or hair on your hands -- or lots of other anomalies.